Hyperspectral Remote Sensing Combined with Ground Vegetation Surveys for the Study of the Age of Rodent Mounds
Hao Qi,
Xiaoni Liu (),
Tong Ji,
Chenglong Ma,
Yafei Shi,
Guoxing He,
Rong Huang,
Yunjun Wang,
Zhuoli Yang and
Dong Lin
Additional contact information
Hao Qi: Key Laboratory of Grassland Ecosystem, Ministry of Education, Lanzhou 730070, China
Xiaoni Liu: Key Laboratory of Grassland Ecosystem, Ministry of Education, Lanzhou 730070, China
Tong Ji: Key Laboratory of Grassland Ecosystem, Ministry of Education, Lanzhou 730070, China
Chenglong Ma: Key Laboratory of Grassland Ecosystem, Ministry of Education, Lanzhou 730070, China
Yafei Shi: Key Laboratory of Grassland Ecosystem, Ministry of Education, Lanzhou 730070, China
Guoxing He: Key Laboratory of Grassland Ecosystem, Ministry of Education, Lanzhou 730070, China
Rong Huang: Key Laboratory of Grassland Ecosystem, Ministry of Education, Lanzhou 730070, China
Yunjun Wang: Key Laboratory of Grassland Ecosystem, Ministry of Education, Lanzhou 730070, China
Zhuoli Yang: Key Laboratory of Grassland Ecosystem, Ministry of Education, Lanzhou 730070, China
Dong Lin: Key Laboratory of Grassland Ecosystem, Ministry of Education, Lanzhou 730070, China
Agriculture, 2024, vol. 14, issue 12, 1-18
Abstract:
Background: Rodents severely damage the ecological environment of grasslands, and rodent mounds of different ages require distinct management strategies. Understanding the age of these mounds aids in formulating targeted restoration measures, which can enhance grassland productivity and biodiversity. Current surveys of rodent mounds rely on ground exposure and mound height to determine their age, which is time-consuming and labor-intensive. Remote sensing methods can quickly and easily identify the distribution of rodent mounds. Existing remote sensing images use ground exposure and mound height for identification but do not distinguish between mounds of different ages, such as one-year-old and two-year-old mounds. According to the existing literature, rodent mounds of different ages exhibit significant differences in vegetation structure, soil background, and plant diversity. Utilizing a combination of vegetation indices and hyperspectral data to determine the age of rodent mounds aims to provide a better method for extracting rodent hazard information. This experiment investigates and analyzes the age, distribution, and vegetation characteristics of rodent mounds, including total coverage, height, biomass, and diversity indices such as Patrick, Shannon–Wiener, and Pielou. Spectral data of rodent mounds of different ages were collected using an Analytical Spectral Devices field spectrometer. Correlation analysis was conducted between vegetation characteristics and spectral vegetation indices to select key indices, including NDVI 670 , NDVI 705 , EVI, TCARI, Ant, and SR. Multiple stepwise regression and Random Forest (RF) inversion models were established using vegetation indices, and the most suitable model was selected through comparison. Random Forest modeling was conducted to classify plateau zokor rat mounds of different ages, using both vegetation characteristic indicators and vegetation indices for comparison. The rodent mound classification models established using vegetation characteristic indicators and vegetation indices through Random Forest could distinguish rodent mounds of different ages, with out-of-bag error rates of 36.96% and 21.74%, respectively. The model using vegetation indices performed better. Conclusions: (1) Rodent mounds play a crucial ecological role in alpine meadow ecosystems by enhancing plant diversity, biomass, and the stability and vitality of the ecosystem. (2) The vegetation indices SR and TCARI are the most influential in classifying rodent mounds. (3) Incorporating vegetation indices into Random Forest modeling facilitates a precise and robust remote sensing interpretation of rodent mound ages, which is instrumental for devising targeted restoration strategies.
Keywords: rodent mounds; succession; hyperspectral; classification; vegetation characteristics; vegetation indices; random forest (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: Q1 Q10 Q11 Q12 Q13 Q14 Q15 Q16 Q17 Q18 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2024
References: View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations:
Downloads: (external link)
https://www.mdpi.com/2077-0472/14/12/2142/pdf (application/pdf)
https://www.mdpi.com/2077-0472/14/12/2142/ (text/html)
Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
HTML/Text
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:gam:jagris:v:14:y:2024:i:12:p:2142-:d:1529339
Access Statistics for this article
Agriculture is currently edited by Ms. Leda Xuan
More articles in Agriculture from MDPI
Bibliographic data for series maintained by MDPI Indexing Manager ().