The Equivalence of Strict Liability and Negligence Rule: A " Trompe l'œil " Perspective
Gerard Mondello
Post-Print from HAL
Abstract:
This paper analyzes the difficulties of comparing the respective effectiveness of two among the most important liability regimes in tort law: rule of negligence and strict liability. Starting from the standard Shavellian unilateral accident scheme, I show that matching up liability regime on their capacity to provide the highest level of safety is ineffective. This demonstration lies on two components. The first one gathers some results drawn from literature that introduces uncertainty. The second one takes into consideration the beliefs of agents and their aversion to ambiguity. The model applies uncertainty to the level of maximum damage. This demonstration reinforces the previous result. Hence, both regimes apply on specific tort question and comparing their individual efficiency needs to call for other components as the transaction costs associated to the burden of evidence, the fairness between victims and injurers, etc.
Keywords: Strict Liability; Negligence Rule; Ambiguity Theory; Uncertainty; Accident Model (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2012-08-01
Note: View the original document on HAL open archive server: https://hal.science/hal-00727223
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (3)
Published in 2012, pp.30
Downloads: (external link)
https://hal.science/hal-00727223/document (application/pdf)
Related works:
Working Paper: The Equivalence of Strict Liability and Negligence Rule: A « Trompe l'œil » Perspective (2012) 
Working Paper: The Equivalence of Strict Liability and Negligence Rule: A « Trompe l'œil » Perspective (2012) 
Working Paper: The Equivalence of Strict Liability and Negligence Rule: A "Trompe l'oeil" Perspective (2012) 
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
HTML/Text
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:hal:journl:hal-00727223
Access Statistics for this paper
More papers in Post-Print from HAL
Bibliographic data for series maintained by CCSD ().