Right temporoparietal junction underlies avoidance of moral transgression in Autism Spectrum Disorder

Yang Hu, Alessandra M. Pereira, Xiaoxue Gao, Brunno M. Campos, Edmund Derrington, Brice Corgnet, Xiaolin Zhou, Fernando Cendes and Jean-Claude Dreher
Additional contact information
Yang Hu: Shanghai International Studies University, ISC-MJ - Institut des sciences cognitives Marc Jeannerod - Centre de neuroscience cognitive - UMR5229 - UCBL - Université Claude Bernard Lyon 1 - Université de Lyon - CNRS - Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique, Peking University [Beijing]
Alessandra M. Pereira: UNICAMP - Universidade Estadual de Campinas = University of Campinas
Xiaoxue Gao: Peking University [Beijing]
Brunno M. Campos: UNICAMP - Universidade Estadual de Campinas = University of Campinas
Edmund Derrington: ISC-MJ - Institut des sciences cognitives Marc Jeannerod - Centre de neuroscience cognitive - UMR5229 - UCBL - Université Claude Bernard Lyon 1 - Université de Lyon - CNRS - Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique, UCBL - Université Claude Bernard Lyon 1 - Université de Lyon
Xiaolin Zhou: Shanghai International Studies University, Peking University [Beijing]
Fernando Cendes: UNICAMP - Universidade Estadual de Campinas = University of Campinas
Jean-Claude Dreher: ISC-MJ - Institut des sciences cognitives Marc Jeannerod - Centre de neuroscience cognitive - UMR5229 - UCBL - Université Claude Bernard Lyon 1 - Université de Lyon - CNRS - Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique, UCBL - Université Claude Bernard Lyon 1 - Université de Lyon

Post-Print from HAL

Abstract: Autism spectrum disorder (ASD) is characterized by a core deficit in theory-of-mind (ToM) ability, which extends to perturbations in moral judgment and decision-making. Although the function of the right temporoparietal junction (rTPJ), a key neural marker of ToM and morality, is known to be altered in autistic individuals, the neurocomputational mechanisms underlying its specific impairment in moral decision-making remain unclear. Here, we addressed this question by employing a novel fMRI task together with computational modeling and representational similarity analysis (RSA). ASD patients and healthy controls (HC) decided in public or private whether to incur a personal cost for funding a morally-good cause (Good Context) or receive a personal gain for benefiting a morally-bad cause (Bad Context). Compared with HC, individuals with ASD were much more likely to reject the opportunity to earn ill-gotten money by supporting a bad cause than HC. Computational modeling revealed that this resulted from unduly weighing benefits for themselves and the bad cause, suggesting that ASD patients apply a rule of refusing to serve a bad cause because they over-evaluate the negative consequences of their actions. Moreover, RSA revealed a reduced rTPJ representation of the information specific to moral contexts in ASD patients. Together, these findings indicate the contribution of rTPJ in representing information concerning moral rules and provide new insights for the neurobiological basis underpinning moral behaviors illustrated by a specific dysfunction of rTPJ in ASD patients.

Keywords: Moral Behavior; theory of mind; neuroscience (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2021-02-24
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:

Published in Journal of Neuroscience, 2021, 41 (8), 1699-1715 p. ⟨10.1523/JNEUROSCI.1237-20.2020⟩

There are no downloads for this item, see the EconPapers FAQ for hints about obtaining it.

Related works:
Working Paper: Right temporoparietal junction underlies avoidance of moral transgression in Autism Spectrum Disorder (2021)
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:hal:journl:hal-03188237

DOI: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.1237-20.2020

Access Statistics for this paper

More papers in Post-Print from HAL
Bibliographic data for series maintained by CCSD ().