Beliefs and (in)stability in normal-form games
Kyle Hyndman,
Antoine Terracol and
Jonathan Vaksmann ()
Additional contact information
Jonathan Vaksmann: GAINS - Groupe d'Analyse des Itinéraires et des Niveaux Salariaux - UM - Le Mans Université
Post-Print from HAL
Abstract:
In this paper, we use experimental data to study players' stability in normal-form games where subjects have to report beliefs and choose actions. Subjects saw each of 12 games four times in a regular or isomorphic form spread over two days without feedback. We document a high degree of stability within the same (strategically equivalent) game, although time and changes in the presentation of the game do lead to less stability. To look at stability across different games, we adopt the level-k theory, and show that stability of both beliefs and actions is significantly lower. Finally, we estimate a structural model in which players either apply a consistent level of reasoning across strategically different games, or reasoning levels change from game to game. Our results show that approximately 23% of subjects apply a consistent level of reasoning across the 12 games, but that they assign a low level of sophistication to their opponent. The remaining 77% apply different levels of reasoning to different games. We show that this may be due to subjects being attracted to the action with the highest possible payoff.
Keywords: Game theory; Beliefs; Stability; Level-k thinking; Experiment (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2022
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (1)
Published in Experimental Economics, 2022, 25 (4), pp.1146-1172. ⟨10.1007/s10683-022-09747-w⟩
There are no downloads for this item, see the EconPapers FAQ for hints about obtaining it.
Related works:
Journal Article: Beliefs and (in)stability in normal-form games (2022) 
Working Paper: Beliefs and (In)Stability in Normal-Form Games (2013) 
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
HTML/Text
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:hal:journl:hal-03709691
DOI: 10.1007/s10683-022-09747-w
Access Statistics for this paper
More papers in Post-Print from HAL
Bibliographic data for series maintained by CCSD ().