EconPapers    
Economics at your fingertips  
 

Preferences for redistributive justice: A participatory-democracy experiment

Olivier Chanel, Stéphane Luchini (), Miriam Teschl () and Alain Trannoy ()
Additional contact information
Stéphane Luchini: CNRS - Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique, AMSE - Aix-Marseille Sciences Economiques - EHESS - École des hautes études en sciences sociales - AMU - Aix Marseille Université - ECM - École Centrale de Marseille - CNRS - Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique
Miriam Teschl: AMSE - Aix-Marseille Sciences Economiques - EHESS - École des hautes études en sciences sociales - AMU - Aix Marseille Université - ECM - École Centrale de Marseille - CNRS - Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique
Alain Trannoy: AMSE - Aix-Marseille Sciences Economiques - EHESS - École des hautes études en sciences sociales - AMU - Aix Marseille Université - ECM - École Centrale de Marseille - CNRS - Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique, EHESS - École des hautes études en sciences sociales, France Stratégie

Working Papers from HAL

Abstract: This paper tests experimentally how preferences for redistribution of members of the general public depend on how money is earned. An experiment was designed to form of "microparticipatory-democracy"where redistribution from winners to losers is decided through a sequential strategy-proof majority voting procedure. Based on five distributive justice theories, we elicit people's preferences for redistribution when their earnings come from four factors: effort, social circumstances, brute luck, and option luck. In the aggregate, our results show that a relative majority of people agree with Dworkin's cut, namely, to compensate for social circumstances and brute luck but not effort and option luck. Participants with bad outcomes are more likely to engage in a self-serving vote, but on average, the dominant concern in voting remains people's fairness view. The knowledge of the distribution of earnings and petition for equality of opportunity make participants vote more in favor of redistribution.

Keywords: Social justice; micro participatory-democracy; equality of opportunity; responsibility; experiment (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2025-12
Note: View the original document on HAL open archive server: https://hal.science/hal-05483448v1
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
https://hal.science/hal-05483448v1/document (application/pdf)

Related works:
Journal Article: Preferences for redistributive justice: A participatory-democracy experiment (2025) Downloads
Working Paper: Preferences for redistributive justice: A participatory-democracy experiment (2025) Downloads
Working Paper: Preferences for redistributive justice: A participatory-democracy experiment (2025)
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:hal:wpaper:hal-05483448

Access Statistics for this paper

More papers in Working Papers from HAL
Bibliographic data for series maintained by CCSD ().

 
Page updated 2026-02-16
Handle: RePEc:hal:wpaper:hal-05483448