EconPapers    
Economics at your fingertips  
 

Revision of the IAB job vacancy survey: backgrounds, methods and results (Revision der IAB-Stellenerhebung: Hintergründe, Methode und Ergebnisse)

Hanna Brenzel, Judith Czepek, Hans Kiesl, Ben Kriechel, Alexander Kubis, Andreas Moczall, Martina Rebien, Christof Röttger, Jörg Szameitat, Anja Warning and Enzo Weber
Additional contact information
Hanna Brenzel: Institute for Employment Research (IAB), Nuremberg, Germany
Judith Czepek: Institute for Employment Research (IAB), Nuremberg, Germany
Alexander Kubis: Institute for Employment Research (IAB), Nuremberg, Germany
Andreas Moczall: Institute for Employment Research (IAB), Nuremberg, Germany
Christof Röttger: Institute for Employment Research (IAB), Nuremberg, Germany
Jörg Szameitat: Institute for Employment Research (IAB), Nuremberg, Germany
Anja Warning: Institute for Employment Research (IAB), Nuremberg, Germany

No 201604 (en), IAB-Forschungsbericht from Institut für Arbeitsmarkt- und Berufsforschung (IAB), Nürnberg [Institute for Employment Research, Nuremberg, Germany]

Abstract: "The German Job Vacancy Survey delivers representative data on the number and structure of vacancies in Germany. Such data cannot be derived from other sources and are therefore unique. The survey includes registered and non-registered vacancies. In course of extensive tests and reviews a new extrapolation procedure has been developed. As a result, the aggregate vacancy supply is revised downwards. Additionally, differences between data on vacancies from the IAB and BA were revealed. The research report is organised as follows: Firstly, an overview about the aim and content of the German Job Vacancy Survey is given. Subsequently, the evolution of the new extrapolation procedure is described. Thirdly, the new method is presented and it is shown that the adaption of it significantly improves the quality of the survey results. Along with the new extrapolation procedure a revised time series dating back to 2000 is given. However, figures before and after 2010 cannot be directly compared. The research report presents the results for both time periods and compares the new and old extrapolation methods." (Author's abstract, IAB-Doku) ((en))

Keywords: Bundesrepublik Deutschland; Datenqualität; Hochrechnung; offene Stellen; Reform; Regressionsanalyse; IAB-Stellenerhebung; Schätzung; 2000-2015 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Pages: 61 pages
Date: 2016-06-07
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
https://doku.iab.de/forschungsbericht/2016/fb0416_en.pdf

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:iab:iabfob:201604(en)

Access Statistics for this paper

More papers in IAB-Forschungsbericht from Institut für Arbeitsmarkt- und Berufsforschung (IAB), Nürnberg [Institute for Employment Research, Nuremberg, Germany] Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by IAB, Geschäftsbereich Wissenschaftliche Fachinformation und Bibliothek ().

 
Page updated 2025-03-30
Handle: RePEc:iab:iabfob:201604(en)