EconPapers    
Economics at your fingertips  
 

Exploitation of Ambiguous Cues to Infer Terrorist Activity

Kevin S. Ni (), Daniel Faissol (), Thomas Edmunds () and Richard Wheeler ()
Additional contact information
Kevin S. Ni: Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory, Livermore, California 94550
Daniel Faissol: Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory, Livermore, California 94550
Thomas Edmunds: Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory, Livermore, California 94550
Richard Wheeler: Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory, Livermore, California 94550

Decision Analysis, 2013, vol. 10, issue 1, 42-62

Abstract: To aid intelligence analysts in processing ambiguous data regarding nuclear terrorism threats, we develop a methodology that captures and accounts for the uncertainty in new information and incorporates prior beliefs on likely nuclear terrorist activity. This methodology can guide the analyst when making difficult decisions regarding what data are most critical to examine and what threats require greater attention. Our methodology is based on a Bayesian statistical approach that incorporates ambiguous cues to update prior beliefs of adversary activity. We characterize the general process of a nuclear terrorist attack on the United States and describe, using a simplified example, how this can be represented by an event tree. We then define hypothetical cues for the example and give notional strengths to each cue. We also perform sensitivity analysis and show how cue strengths can affect inference. The method can be used to help support decisions regarding resource allocation and interdiction.

Keywords: Bayesian analysis; ambiguous information; nuclear counterterrorism; nuclear terrorism; national security; event tree; decision support; decision analysis (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2013
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (3)

Downloads: (external link)
http://dx.doi.org/10.1287/deca.1120.0259 (application/pdf)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:inm:ordeca:v:10:y:2013:i:1:p:42-62

Access Statistics for this article

More articles in Decision Analysis from INFORMS Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Chris Asher ().

 
Page updated 2025-03-19
Handle: RePEc:inm:ordeca:v:10:y:2013:i:1:p:42-62