EconPapers    
Economics at your fingertips  
 

“Gaming the System”: Decision Making by Interdependent Critical Infrastructure

Allison C. Reilly (), Andrew Samuel () and Seth D. Guikema ()
Additional contact information
Allison C. Reilly: Industrial and Operations Engineering, College of Engineering, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan 48109; Department of Geography and Environmental Engineering, Whiting School of Engineering, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, Maryland 21218
Andrew Samuel: Department of Economics, Sellinger School of Business, Loyola University Maryland, Baltimore, Maryland 21210
Seth D. Guikema: Industrial and Operations Engineering, College of Engineering, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan 48109; Department of Geography and Environmental Engineering, Whiting School of Engineering, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, Maryland 21218

Decision Analysis, 2015, vol. 12, issue 4, 155-172

Abstract: Supporting strong, resilient, and integrated critical infrastructure is vital to upholding the U.S. economy and its national security. Arguably, no sector of the economy could exist without the reliable and predictable networks on which it depends. To date, the research on interdependent infrastructure has concentrated on describing the sources of the dependencies and developing models for predicting performance and cascading disruptions after a hazardous event. However, these models fail to capture the perspective of the operators of these networks and how competing, independent objectives lead to suboptimal investment decisions and hence suboptimal network performance. Rather than focus on how interdependent infrastructures operate and possibly fail, we take the perspective of their operators and ask why they make the decisions that they do. The goal of this paper is to demonstrate how strategic interdependencies may impact performance of coupled systems by shifting investments away from what is collectively best toward decisions that are more myopic and optimal from the perspective of a single infrastructure. Through our model, we make inferences on the level of investments networks make, relate this to performance, and provide policy recommendations on how to promote reliable infrastructure.

Keywords: interdependent infrastructure; game theory; strategic interdependency (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2015
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (4)

Downloads: (external link)
http://dx.doi.org/10.1287/deca.2015.0318 (application/pdf)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:inm:ordeca:v:12:y:2015:i:4:p:155-172

Access Statistics for this article

More articles in Decision Analysis from INFORMS Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Chris Asher ().

 
Page updated 2025-03-19
Handle: RePEc:inm:ordeca:v:12:y:2015:i:4:p:155-172