Identifying and Structuring the Objectives of the Islamic State of Iraq and the Levant (ISIL) and Its Followers
Johannes Siebert (),
Detlof von Winterfeldt () and
Richard S. John ()
Additional contact information
Johannes Siebert: Operations Management, Faculty of Law, Economics, and Management, University of Bayreuth, D-95440 Bayreuth, Germany
Detlof von Winterfeldt: Epstein Department of Industrial and Systems Engineering, Viterbi School of Engineering, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, California 90089
Richard S. John: Department of Psychology, Dornsife College of Letters, Arts, and Sciences, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, California 90089
Decision Analysis, 2016, vol. 13, issue 1, 26-50
Abstract:
This study addresses three questions: What are the objectives of the leaders of ISIL? What are the objectives of the followers of ISIL? How are the two sets of objectives related? To answer these questions, we analyzed the transcripts of interviews and presentations of 59 subject matter experts (SMEs) and conducted a separate analysis of speeches of ISIL leaders and selected Internet sources. In both efforts we identified and structured the strategic, fundamental, and means objectives of ISIL and its followers. The results indicate that ISIL’s leaders pursue four strategic objectives: (1) Establish a Caliphate in Iraq and the Levant, (2) Control and Govern the Caliphate, (3) Expand Islam and Sharia Law Worldwide, and (4) Recreate the Power and Glory of (Sunni) Islam. The followers’ objectives can be partitioned into three strategic objectives: Humanitarian Fulfillment, Religious Fulfillment, and Personal Fulfillment. The objectives identified from the SME interviews were similar to those identified from ISIL leaders’ statements and the Internet. However, the Internet search revealed many more personal objectives of ISIL followers. The results further indicate that ISIL’s leadership objectives are closely aligned with those of its followers. There also is a sharp contrast between the objectives of ISIL and those of Al Qaeda, particularly ISIL’s emphasis on occupying and controlling territories in Iraq and Syria versus Al Qaeda’s focus on worldwide jihad.
Keywords: decision analysis; multiple objectives; terrorism; risk; ISIL (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2016
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (4)
Downloads: (external link)
http://dx.doi.org/10.1287/deca.2015.0324 (application/pdf)
Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
HTML/Text
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:inm:ordeca:v:13:y:2016:i:1:p:26-50
Access Statistics for this article
More articles in Decision Analysis from INFORMS Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Chris Asher ().