An Empirical Comparison of Rank-Based Surrogate Weights in Additive Multiattribute Decision Analysis
Roger Chapman Burk () and
Richard M. Nehring ()
Additional contact information
Roger Chapman Burk: U.S. Military Academy, West Point, New York 10996
Richard M. Nehring: Nucor Corporation, College Station, Texas 75846
Decision Analysis, 2023, vol. 20, issue 1, 55-72
Abstract:
Many methods for creating surrogate swing weights based only on the rank order of the attributes are proposed to avoid the cost and effort of eliciting weights in multiattribute decision analysis. We explore empirically how well eight different methods perform based on a large sample of real-world elicited weights. We use the Euclidean distance from the elicited weights to judge the quality of the surrogate weights as well as three other metrics. The sum reciprocal method gives results, on average, statistically closest to the elicited weights for all metrics used. The equal ratio method using a fixed ratio of 0.716 performs just as well on three of the metrics. The rank sum method, the simplest and one of the oldest methods, performs generally next best. The rank order centroid method, which does well in simulation studies, performs relatively poorly in this evaluation using real-world data.
Keywords: multiple-attribute decision analysis; attribute weights; surrogate weights; rank sum; rank exponent; rank reciprocal; sum reciprocal; equal ratio; rank order centroid; linear with variable slope; rank order distribution (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2023
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations:
Downloads: (external link)
http://dx.doi.org/10.1287/deca.2022.0456 (application/pdf)
Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
HTML/Text
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:inm:ordeca:v:20:y:2023:i:1:p:55-72
Access Statistics for this article
More articles in Decision Analysis from INFORMS Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Chris Asher ().