Graphical Models for Groups: Belief Aggregation and Risk Sharing

David M. Pennock () and Michael Wellman
Additional contact information
David M. Pennock: Yahoo! Research, 74 N. Pasadena Avenue, 3rd Floor, Pasadena, California 91103

Decision Analysis, 2005, vol. 2, issue 3, 148-164

Abstract: We investigate the practical value of using graphical models to aid in two fundamental problems of group coordination: (1) belief aggregation and (2) risk sharing. We identify restrictive conditions under which graphical models can be useful in both settings. We show that the output of the logarithmic opinion pool (LogOP) can be represented as a Markov network (MN) or a decomposable Bayesian network (BN), and give an algorithm for doing so. We show that a securities market structured like a decomposable BN can support optimal risk sharing, if all agents have exponential utility and all of their Markov independencies coincide with the market structure. On the other hand, most of our results are negative, taking the form of impossibility theorems. We show that no belief aggregation function can maintain all independencies representable in a BN. Neither can an aggregation computation be decomposed into local computations on graph subsets. We show that computing query outputs of LogOP or the linear opinion pool (LinOP) is NP-hard. Except in fairly restrictive settings, structuring securities markets according to unanimously agreed upon independencies may be of no help in supporting optimal risk sharing because agents’ behavioral independencies change as they engage in securities trade.

Keywords: belief aggregation; opinion pools; consensus probabilities; risk sharing and allocation; securities markets; Bayesian networks; Markov networks; graphical models; multiagent systems (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2005
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (3)

Downloads: (external link)
http://dx.doi.org/10.1287/deca.1050.0048 (application/pdf)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:inm:ordeca:v:2:y:2005:i:3:p:148-164

Access Statistics for this article

More articles in Decision Analysis from INFORMS Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Chris Asher ().