Two-Stage Estimation and Variance Modeling for Latency-Constrained Variational Quantum Algorithms
Yunsoo Ha (),
Sara Shashaani () and
Matt Menickelly ()
Additional contact information
Yunsoo Ha: Computational Science Center, National Renewable Energy Laboratory, Golden, Colorado 80401
Sara Shashaani: Edward P. Fitts Department of Industrial and Systems Engineering, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, North Carolina 27695
Matt Menickelly: Mathematics and Computer Science Division, Argonne National Laboratory, Lemont, Illinois 60439
INFORMS Journal on Computing, 2025, vol. 37, issue 1, 125-145
Abstract:
The quantum approximate optimization algorithm (QAOA) has enjoyed increasing attention in noisy, intermediate-scale quantum computing with its application to combinatorial optimization problems. QAOA has the potential to demonstrate a quantum advantage for NP-hard combinatorial optimization problems. As a hybrid quantum-classical algorithm, the classical component of QAOA resembles a simulation optimization problem in which the simulation outcomes are attainable only through a quantum computer. The simulation that derives from QAOA exhibits two unique features that can have a substantial impact on the optimization process: (i) the variance of the stochastic objective values typically decreases in proportion to the optimality gap, and (ii) querying samples from a quantum computer introduces an additional latency overhead. In this paper, we introduce a novel stochastic trust-region method derived from a derivative-free, adaptive sampling trust-region optimization method intended to efficiently solve the classical optimization problem in QAOA by explicitly taking into account the two mentioned characteristics. The key idea behind the proposed algorithm involves constructing two separate local models in each iteration: a model of the objective function and a model of the variance of the objective function. Exploiting the variance model allows us to restrict the number of communications with the quantum computer and also helps navigate the nonconvex objective landscapes typical in QAOA optimization problems. We numerically demonstrate the superiority of our proposed algorithm using the SimOpt library and Qiskit when we consider a metric of computational burden that explicitly accounts for communication costs.
Keywords: quantum approximate optimization algorithm; simulation optimization; derivative-free optimization; two-stage estimation; state-dependent noise; trust-region optimization; adaptive sampling (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2025
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:
Downloads: (external link)
http://dx.doi.org/10.1287/ijoc.2024.0575 (application/pdf)
Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
HTML/Text
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:inm:orijoc:v:37:y:2025:i:1:p:125-145
Access Statistics for this article
More articles in INFORMS Journal on Computing from INFORMS Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Chris Asher ().