EconPapers    
Economics at your fingertips  
 

Bias in Pert Project Completion Time Calculations for a Real Network

A. R. Klingel, Jr.
Additional contact information
A. R. Klingel, Jr.: Standard Oil Company (Ohio), Cleveland, Ohio

Management Science, 1966, vol. 13, issue 4, B194-B201

Abstract: Among network techniques recently widely employed in program management, Pert is addressed to the problem of assessing the manager's chances of completing a project on time. Theory and monte carlo simulation have shown that the Pert method yields results which are biased high, and this paper discusses a real example involving conditions under which the bias is very large. The manager is thus grossly misled into thinking his chances are very good, when in reality they are very poor. If the manager's network has multiple parallel paths with relatively equal means and large variances, Pert calculations will be considerably biased. Simulation can be utilized to estimate the distribution of completion time in this case, and guide the manager in appraising and controlling his chances of completion.

Date: 1966
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (8)

Downloads: (external link)
http://dx.doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.13.4.B194 (application/pdf)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:inm:ormnsc:v:13:y:1966:i:4:p:b194-b201

Access Statistics for this article

More articles in Management Science from INFORMS Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Chris Asher ().

 
Page updated 2025-03-19
Handle: RePEc:inm:ormnsc:v:13:y:1966:i:4:p:b194-b201