The Impact of Corruption on Entry Strategy: Evidence from Telecommunication Projects in Emerging Economies
Klaus Uhlenbruck (),
Peter Rodriguez (),
Jonathan Doh () and
Lorraine Eden ()
Additional contact information
Klaus Uhlenbruck: Department of Management and Marketing, University of Montana, Missoula, Montana 59812-6808
Peter Rodriguez: Darden Graduate School of Business Administration, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, Virginia 22906-6550
Jonathan Doh: Department of Management, Villanova University, Villanova, Pennsylvania 19085
Organization Science, 2006, vol. 17, issue 3, 402-414
Abstract:
With globalization and the growth in emerging economies, multinational enterprises (MNEs) now frequently confront challenges associated with corrupt governments. Already, a growing body of research has demonstrated that corruption significantly reduces a country’s aggregate inflows of foreign direct investment through its effects on firm performance. We move the analysis of corruption from aggregate financial flows toward managerial theory and practice by examining how firms adjust their strategy for entering foreign markets in corrupt environments and how different types of corruption affect firms’ choices. Building on institutional theory, we predict that MNEs will respond to pervasive and arbitrary corruption in a host country by selecting particular types of equity and nonequity modes of entry. Using data on 220 telecommunications development projects in 64 emerging economies, we find that firms adapt to the pressures of corruption via short-term contracting and entry into joint ventures. We also find that the arbitrariness surrounding corrupt transactions has a significant impact on firms’ decisions, in addition to the overall level of corruption. In contrast to extant research, we show that MNEs use nonequity-entry modes or partnering as an adaptive strategy to participate in markets despite the presence of corruption.
Keywords: corruption; mode of entry; emerging economies (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2006
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (166)
Downloads: (external link)
http://dx.doi.org/10.1287/orsc.1060.0186 (application/pdf)
Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
HTML/Text
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:inm:ororsc:v:17:y:2006:i:3:p:402-414
Access Statistics for this article
More articles in Organization Science from INFORMS Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Chris Asher ().