Continuous Learning: The Influence of National Institutional Logics on Training Attitudes

Xiaowei Luo ()
Additional contact information
Xiaowei Luo: Department of Business Administration, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, 163 Wohlers Hall, 1206 South 6th Street, Champaign, Illinois 61820

Organization Science, 2007, vol. 18, issue 2, 280-296

Abstract: This research attempts to understand and test a core assumption in neoinstitutional theory, i.e., that institutional logics shape individual attitudes and preferences, by studying cross-national differences in people’s attitudes toward the continuous learning model of employee training---an increasingly popular model of training. I propose that national institutional logics regarding the individual’s role (empowered versus limited) can shape people’s preferences for the new model of training. By using a historically grounded typology of national polities depicting the organization of authority (statism) and society (corporateness), I suggest how these two dimensions carry distinct logics about the individual’s role and, in turn, shape people’s training orientation. Training attitudes of people in 16 European (EU) countries/regions are examined using data from the 1995 Eurobarometer Training Survey. Results from hierarchical models show that, beyond the influence of individual characteristics, people from nonstatist (i.e., collective authority is located in civil society rather than in the state) and noncorporatist (i.e., individuals are incorporated into the society as autonomous actors rather than members in collectives) countries are more likely to prefer the continuous learning model of training. By explicitly linking institutional logics with individual attitudes, this study contributes to the neoinstitutional perspective, studies on training attitudes, and cross-national research.

Keywords: institutional theory; macro-micro links; cross-national research; individual attitudes; employee training (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2007
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (12)

Downloads: (external link)
http://dx.doi.org/10.1287/orsc.1060.0230 (application/pdf)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:inm:ororsc:v:18:y:2007:i:2:p:280-296

Access Statistics for this article

More articles in Organization Science from INFORMS Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Chris Asher ().