Modelling circular economy impacts in the context of a transition to a fair and sustainable economy. The need to combine bottom-up and top-down MFA, LCA and GE Models

Arnold Tukker and Jose Manuel Rueda Cantuche ()
Additional contact information
Jose Manuel Rueda Cantuche: European Commission - JRC, https://joint-research-centre.ec.europa.eu/index_en

No JRC139498, JRC Research Reports from Joint Research Centre

Abstract: Existing forward-looking models such as Integrated Assessment Models (IAMs), Energy models, and (Computable) General Equilibrium (GE) models work well for assessing energy and climate problems. But such top-down, usually economy-wide models have limited sector resolution. They cannot assess highly product specific circular economy (CE) strategies such as component re-use, refurbishment, or high quality material recycling. This requires detailed physical systems modelling. Material Flow Analysis (MFA) and Life cycle assessment/costing (LCA/LCC) offer this detail and physical basis. But these mainly physical, partial and static bottom-up models lack the economy-wide socio-economic impact assessment capabilities and endogenized dynamic features of e.g. GE models. We propose here a hybrid approach as solution. GE models with an Input Output (IO) core could be used as a basis, at a state of the art detail of 100-150 sectors/products and over150 countries, preferably backed by a (consortium of) international institutions to provide formal status. Higher detail, physical layers, and sectoral capital stock vintage information may be provided in a research context. Detailed bottom-up MFA and LCA/LCC assessments are then to be hard- or soft-linked to the IO core of the GE model. Even then questions remain as how CE interventions may induce changes in value added capturing in economic networks, stimulate diffusion of new technologies, and limit damages of environmental change on the economy. Additional qualitative and quantitative assessments can help to include such effects exogenously in a GE model. The fallacy of modelling the future based on historical trends can be overcome by using models in a back casting rather than forecasting mode. Models then are used to check under which conditions pathways to normatively desired futures can be realized. This approach allows assessing the social, economic and environmental impacts of CE policies comprehensively, and hence how CE can support the transition to a fair and sustainable economy.

Date: 2024-11
New Economics Papers: this item is included in nep-ene, nep-env, nep-hme and nep-mac
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
https://publications.jrc.ec.europa.eu/repository/handle/JRC139498 (application/pdf)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:ipt:iptwpa:jrc139498

Access Statistics for this paper

More papers in JRC Research Reports from Joint Research Centre Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Publication Officer ().