Farming and rural development in Ukraine: making dualisation work
Keyzer Michiel A. (),
Max D. Merbis (),
Rudolf Witt,
Valeriy Heyets (),
Odena Borodina () and
Ihor Prokopa ()
Additional contact information
Keyzer Michiel A.: Centre for World Food Studies VU University, Amsterdam
Max D. Merbis: Centre for World Food Studies VU University, Amsterdam
Rudolf Witt: Centre for World Food Studies VU University, Amsterdam
Valeriy Heyets: Department of Economy and Policy of Agrarian Transformations Institute for Economics and Forecasting National Academy of Sciences of Ukraine, Kiev
Odena Borodina: Department of Economy and Policy of Agrarian Transformations Institute for Economics and Forecasting National Academy of Sciences of Ukraine, Kiev
Ihor Prokopa: Department of Economy and Policy of Agrarian Transformations Institute for Economics and Forecasting National Academy of Sciences of Ukraine, Kiev
No JRC80164, JRC Research Reports from Joint Research Centre
Abstract:
Rural economy 1. Following the decollectivisation of agriculture in Ukraine, the dualisation between very large commercial farms and small individual farms has become a prevalent trend in the rural areas of Ukraine. 2. Rural farm households would need larger plots. They could benefit from mechanization. 3. Yet, as their crop yields are low and lie close to those of large farms that use far more chemical inputs and machinery, the area expansion could be kept modest. 4. Distribution of land ownership rights and cadastral registration need to be supplemented by introduction and registration of other formal titles such as the right of passage and the user rights in commons. 5. Shareholders of a large farm do not need to know the precise location of their property within the farm. Explicit cadastral registration of parcels into units smaller than the individual field is wasteful. 6. Land users should be made to pay due rent to landowners, private (e.g. pensioners), and public (e.g. municipalities), and no longer predominantly in kind. This could improve social safety nets, stimulate activities in rural villages, and improve the fiscal revenue of local governments. 7. Corporate farms should pay corporate taxes. 8. Since growth in employment has been stagnating in urban areas, rural areas have to provide for it, partly in horticulture, animal husbandry and agricultural processing, and partly in expanded household farms, possibly as small multi-household enterprises or cooperatives, on land returned from commercial farms. Foreign trade 9. Access to exports should be made available to all who deliver goods of adequate quality, and not only to specific trading companies who can get access to export licenses. 10. Product labelling on exports, could with adequate inspections, with labels requiring satisfaction of social as well as environmental standards, provide effective means to complement and support local governance. 11. Ukraine has considerable scope to step up its exports of grain and oilseeds, which might significantly contribute to world food security. Yet, to effectuate this expansion without amplifying prevailing price volatility, Ukraine will have to enhance its management of irrigation, storage and plant protection, to limit its support to biofuels and to abstain from imposition of export bans in response to shortfalls. Nutrient management 12. Large exports amount to large outflow of plant nutrients, and turn recycling and imports of nutrients into a necessity in preventing soil fertility loss and land degradation. Expansion of livestock activities with proper manure management also helps to compensate for this loss. Statistics and governance 13. There is domestic and foreign demand for independent and reliable information on prevailing social and environmental conditions, and trade regimes in Ukraine. A data platform that makes use of the available surveys, and avails of some capacity to conduct new ones could help meeting this need.
Keywords: Sustainable agriculture; farm-households economics; food security; rural development; quantitative economic analysis; Common Agricultural Policy (CAP); modelling; European Development Cooperation; ex-ante & ex-post impact assessment; regional and farm typologies. (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Pages: 60 pages
Date: 2012-12
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (2)
Downloads: (external link)
https://publications.jrc.ec.europa.eu/repository/handle/JRC80164 (application/pdf)
Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
HTML/Text
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:ipt:iptwpa:jrc80164
Access Statistics for this paper
More papers in JRC Research Reports from Joint Research Centre Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Publication Officer ().