How Prevalent Is Downward Rigidity in Nominal Wages? Evidence from Payroll Records in Washington State

Ekaterina Jardim, Gary Solon and Jacob Vigdor
Additional contact information
Ekaterina Jardim: Amazon

No 12124, IZA Discussion Papers from IZA Network @ LISER

Abstract: For more than 80 years, many macroeconomic analyses have been premised on the assumption that workers' nominal wage rates cannot be cut. The U.S. evidence on this assumption has been inconclusive because of distortions from reporting error in household surveys. Following a British literature, we reconsider the issue with more accurate wage data from the payroll records of most employers in the State of Washington over the period 2005-2015. For every one of the 40 four-quarters-apart periods for which we observe year-to-year wage changes, we find that at least 20 percent of job stayers experience nominal wage reductions.

Keywords: payroll records; nominal wage rigidity (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: E24 J3 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Pages: 26 pages
Date: 2019-01
New Economics Papers: this item is included in nep-hme, nep-lma and nep-mac
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (51)

Published

Downloads: (external link)
https://docs.iza.org/dp12124.pdf (application/pdf)

Related works:
Working Paper: How Prevalent Is Downward Rigidity in Nominal Wages? Evidence from Payroll Records in Washington State (2019)
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:iza:izadps:dp12124

Access Statistics for this paper

More papers in IZA Discussion Papers from IZA Network @ LISER Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Mark Fallak ().