Who Voted for Trump? Populism and Social Capital

Paola Giuliano and Romain Wacziarg

No 13571, IZA Discussion Papers from IZA Network @ LISER

Abstract: We argue that low levels of social capital are conducive to the electoral success of populist movements. Using a variety of data sources for the 2016 US Presidential election at the county and individual levels, we show that social capital, measured either by the density of memberships in civic, religious and sports organizations or by generalized trust, is significantly negatively correlated with the vote share and favorability rating of Donald Trump around the time of the election.

Keywords: social capital; voting behavior; populism (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: D72 Z1 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Pages: 35 pages
Date: 2020-08
New Economics Papers: this item is included in nep-cdm
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (22)

Downloads: (external link)
https://docs.iza.org/dp13571.pdf (application/pdf)

Related works:
Working Paper: Who Voted for Trump? Populism and Social Capital (2020)
Working Paper: Who Voted for Trump? Populism and Social Capital (2020)
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:iza:izadps:dp13571

Access Statistics for this paper

More papers in IZA Discussion Papers from IZA Network @ LISER Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Mark Fallak ().