Influenza Vaccination Behavior and Media Reporting of Adverse Events

Ylenia Brilli, Claudio Lucifora, Alessia Russo () and Marco Tonello
Additional contact information
Alessia Russo: Norwegian Business School (BI)

No 13636, IZA Discussion Papers from IZA Network @ LISER

Abstract: We study the role of media reporting of alleged adverse effects of influenza vaccination on adults' (aged 50 or more) decisions to vaccinate against the flu. We exploit the diffusion of news linking suspected deaths to the vaccine, during the 2014 vaccination campaign in Italy. Using daily variation in news items across the 2014 campaign and the previous year campaign, unaffected by media cases, we show that media reporting decreases flu vaccination by about 2.5% (78 fewer vaccinations per day). The effect, however, is short-lived, as it fades away after approximately 10 days from the news outbreak.

Keywords: mass media; vaccination; influenza (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: I12 I18 J10 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Pages: 24 pages
Date: 2020-08
New Economics Papers: this item is included in nep-hea
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (2)

Published - published in: Health Policy, 2020, 124 (112), 1403 - 1411

Downloads: (external link)
https://docs.iza.org/dp13636.pdf (application/pdf)

Related works:
Journal Article: Influenza vaccination behavior and media reporting of adverse events (2020)
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:iza:izadps:dp13636

Access Statistics for this paper

More papers in IZA Discussion Papers from IZA Network @ LISER Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Mark Fallak ().