Estimating Peer Effects among College Students: Evidence from a Field Experiment of One-to-One Pairings in STEM

Robert Fairlie, Daniel Oliver, Glenn Millhauser and Randa Roland
Additional contact information
Daniel Oliver: Washington State Student Achievement Council
Glenn Millhauser: University of California, Santa Cruz
Randa Roland: University of California, Santa Cruz

No 17358, IZA Discussion Papers from Institute of Labor Economics (IZA)

Abstract: An extensive literature in the social sciences analyzes peer effects among students, but estimation is complicated by several major problems some of which cannot be solved even with random assignment. We design a field experiment and propose a new estimation technique to address these estimation problems including the mechanical problems associated with repeated observations within peer groups noted by Angrist (2014). The field experiment randomly assigns students to one-to-one partnerships in an important gateway STEM course at a large public university. We find no evidence of peer effects from estimates of exogenous peer effect models. We push further and estimate outcome-on-outcome models which sometimes reveal peer effects when exogenous models do not provide good proxies for ability. We find some limited evidence of small, positive outcome-on-outcome peer effects (which would have been missed without our new estimation technique). Standard estimation methods fail to detect peer effects and even return negative estimates in our Monte Carlo simulations because of the downward bias due to mechanical problems. Simulations reveal additional advantages of our technique especially when peer group sizes are fixed. Estimates of non-linear effects, heterogeneous effects, and different measures of peer ability and outcomes reveal mostly null effects but we find some evidence that low-ability peers negatively affect low-ability and medium-ability students. The findings in this setting of long-term, intensive interactions with classroom random assignment and "throwing everything at it" provide evidence of, at most, small positive peer effects contrasting with the common finding of large peer effects in previous studies in education.

Keywords: peer effects; higher education; STEM; field experiment (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: I21 I23 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Pages: 54 pages
Date: 2024-10
New Economics Papers: this item is included in nep-edu, nep-exp, nep-inv and nep-ure
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
https://docs.iza.org/dp17358.pdf (application/pdf)

Related works:
Working Paper: Estimating Peer Effects among College Students: Evidence from a Field Experiment of One-to-One Pairings in STEM (2024)
Working Paper: Estimating Peer Effects among College Students: Evidence from a Field Experiment of One-to-One Pairings in STEM (2024)
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:iza:izadps:dp17358

Ordering information: This working paper can be ordered from
IZA, Margard Ody, P.O. Box 7240, D-53072 Bonn, Germany

Access Statistics for this paper

More papers in IZA Discussion Papers from Institute of Labor Economics (IZA) IZA, P.O. Box 7240, D-53072 Bonn, Germany. Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Holger Hinte ().