Gender Differences in Performance Evaluations

Katja Görlitz and Tim Sels ()
Additional contact information
Tim Sels: UC Berkeley

No 17877, IZA Discussion Papers from IZA Network @ LISER

Abstract: This study analyzes the gender gap in self- and peer evaluations based on a laboratory experiment. Five players performed a creativity task in a high-stakes winner-takes-all tournament. The treatment without validation informed all players that evaluations that they will conduct determine who will win. The treatment with public validation additionally informed them that they can see an objective performance measure of all players (including themselves) at the end of the experiment which is irrelevant for winning. The results show that men give themselves better selfevaluations compared to women when there is no validation. This gender difference vanishes completely when providing public validation.

Keywords: self-evaluation; peer evaluation; public validation; gender (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: J16 M50 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2025-05
New Economics Papers: this item is included in nep-exp, nep-gen, nep-hrm and nep-spo
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
https://docs.iza.org/dp17877.pdf (application/pdf)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:iza:izadps:dp17877

Access Statistics for this paper

More papers in IZA Discussion Papers from IZA Network @ LISER Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Mark Fallak ().