Charity and Favoritism in the Field: Are Female Economists Nicer (To Each Other)?

Jason Abrevaya and Daniel Hamermesh

No 4921, IZA Discussion Papers from IZA Network @ LISER

Abstract: Using a very large sample of matched author-referee pairs, we examine how the gender of referees and authors affects the former's recommendations. Relying on changing matches of authors and referees, we find no evidence of gender differences among referees in charitableness toward authors; nor do we find any effect of the interaction between the referees’ and authors' gender. With substantial research showing gender differences in fairness, the results suggest that an ethos of objectivity can overcome tendencies toward same-group favoritism/opposite-group discrimination.

Keywords: academe; discrimination; gender (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: J71 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Pages: 21 pages
Date: 2010-05
New Economics Papers: this item is included in nep-lab and nep-sog
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (2)

Published - published in: Review of Economics and Statistics, 2012, 94 (1), 202-207

Downloads: (external link)
https://docs.iza.org/dp4921.pdf (application/pdf)

Related works:
Journal Article: Charity and Favoritism in the Field: Are Female Economists Nicer (To Each Other)? (2012)
Working Paper: Charity and Favoritism in the Field: Are Female Economists Nicer (to Each Other)? (2010)
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:iza:izadps:dp4921

Access Statistics for this paper

More papers in IZA Discussion Papers from IZA Network @ LISER Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Mark Fallak ().