Thumbscrews for Agencies or for Individuals? How to Reduce Unemployment

Andrey Launov and Klaus Wälde

No 7659, IZA Discussion Papers from IZA Network @ LISER

Abstract: To which extent does an increase in operating effectiveness of public employment agencies on the one hand and a reduction of unemployment benefits on the other reduce unemployment? Using the recent labour market reform in Germany as background we find that the role of unemployment benefit reduction for the reduction of unemployment is very modest (7% of the observed decline). Enhanced effectiveness of public employment agencies, to the contrary, explains a substantial part (34%) of the observed post-reform unemployment decline. If disincentive effects of PEA reforms had been avoided, the effect could have increased to 51%.

Keywords: structural model; employment agencies; unemployment benefits; labour market reform; unemployment (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: E24 J65 J68 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Pages: 37 pages
Date: 2013-09
New Economics Papers: this item is included in nep-lab and nep-mac
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (11)

Forthcoming - substantially revised version published as 'The Employment Effect of Reforming a Public Employment Agency' in: European Economic Review, 2016, 84, 140-164

Downloads: (external link)
https://docs.iza.org/dp7659.pdf (application/pdf)

Related works:
Working Paper: Thumbscrews for Agencies or for Individuals? How to Reduce Unemployment (2013)
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:iza:izadps:dp7659

Access Statistics for this paper

More papers in IZA Discussion Papers from IZA Network @ LISER Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Mark Fallak ().