Conflicting Information and Compliance with COVID-19 Behavioral Recommendations

Asmeret Naugle (), Fred Rothganger (), Stephen Verzi () and Casey Doyle ()

Journal of Artificial Societies and Social Simulation, 2022, vol. 25, issue 4, 6

Abstract: The prevalence of COVID-19 is shaped by behavioral responses to recommendations and warnings. Available information on the disease determines the population’s perception of danger and thus its behavior; this information changes dynamically, and different sources may report conflicting information. We study the feedback between disease, information, and stay-at-home behavior using a hybrid agent-based-system dynamics model that incorporates evolving trust in sources of information. We use this model to investigate how divergent reporting and conflicting information can alter the trajectory of a public health crisis. The model shows that divergent reporting not only alters disease prevalence over time, but also increases polarization of the population’s behaviors and trust in different sources of information.

Keywords: COVID-19; Trust; Polarization; Public Health Messaging; Influence; Opinion Dynamics (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2022-10-31
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
https://www.jasss.org/25/4/6/6.pdf (application/pdf)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:jas:jasssj:2021-153-2

Access Statistics for this article

More articles in Journal of Artificial Societies and Social Simulation from Journal of Artificial Societies and Social Simulation
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Francesco Renzini ().