Which Capital Flow Surge Methods Are Better at Predicting Reversals and Sudden Stops?: Balancing Type 1 and Type 2 Errors

Yongseok Choi, Levan Efremidze (), Ozan Sula and Thomas D. Willett
Additional contact information
Yongseok Choi: Claremont Graduate University
Levan Efremidze: Claremont Institute for Economic Policy Studies (CIEPS), Claremont Graduate University
Ozan Sula: Claremont Institute for Economic Policy Studies (CIEPS), Claremont Graduate University
Thomas D. Willett: Claremont Institute for Economic Policy Studies (CIEPS), Claremont Graduate University

Open Economies Review, 2025, vol. 36, issue 3, No 3, 824 pages

Abstract: Abstract Capital flow surges have become a major source of concern as they have been often followed by disruptive reversals and sudden stops. We introduce F-score methodology which evaluates how well particular capital flow surge method can predict reversals and sudden stops. F-scores consider both type 1 and type 2 errors and provide policy makers a framework to weigh economic costs of false negative and false positive signals. We construct and compare a large number of commonly used surge identification approaches, including several machine-learning methods, to investigate which types of formulations best help explain which surges are more likely to be reversed. While considerable literature has investigated the determinants of capital flow reversals and sudden stops with surges being included as one of the independent variables, so far little research attention has been focused directly on attempting to determine the likelihood that particular surge will result in reversals or sudden stops. This is the most important question for policies toward capital inflows since the optimal responses to capital flow surges would be quite different depending on whether the flows are likely to be reversed or not. Unfortunately, theory does not offer a clear guide to identifying surges other than that they are unusually large inflows. We emphasize that appropriate evaluation should involve not only precision in predicting reversals but also accuracy in not giving false alarms by predicting reversals that do not occur. In other words, attention needs to be paid to both type 1 and type 2 errors.

Keywords: Capital flow surge; Capital flow reversal; Sudden stop; F-score; External crisis; Type 1 and 2 errors; F3; F31; F32; F34; F37; F38 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2025
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s11079-024-09779-0 Abstract (text/html)
Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:kap:openec:v:36:y:2025:i:3:d:10.1007_s11079-024-09779-0

Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from
http://www.springer. ... cs/journal/11079/PS2

DOI: 10.1007/s11079-024-09779-0

Access Statistics for this article

Open Economies Review is currently edited by G.S. Tavlas

More articles in Open Economies Review from Springer
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Sonal Shukla () and Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing ().