The Aggregate Production Function and Solow's "Three Denials"

Jesus Felipe and John McCombie

Economics Working Paper Archive from Levy Economics Institute

Abstract: This paper offers a retrospective view of the key pillar of Solow's neoclassical growth model, namely the aggregate production function. We review how this tool came to life and how it has survived until today, despite three criticisms that undermined its raison d'etre. They are the Cambridge Capital Theory Controversies, the Aggregation Problem, and the Accounting Identity. These criticisms were forgotten by the profession, not because they were wrong but because of the key role played by Robert Solow in the field. Today, these criticisms are not even mentioned when students are introduced to (neoclassical) growth theory, which is presented in most economics departments and macroeconomics textbooks as the only theory worth studying.

Keywords: Accounting Identity; Aggregation Problem; Cambridge Capital Theory Controversies; Solow (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: B22 B31 B32 B41 E13 E25 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2024-03
New Economics Papers: this item is included in nep-his, nep-hme, nep-hpe and nep-pke
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
https://www.levyinstitute.org/wp-content/uploads/2025/03/wp__1046.pdf (application/pdf)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:lev:wrkpap:wp_1046

Access Statistics for this paper

More papers in Economics Working Paper Archive from Levy Economics Institute
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Lindsey Carter ().