Stimulus Without Debt

Laurence Seidman

Challenge, 2013, vol. 56, issue 6, 38-59

Abstract: The persistent argument against Keynesian stimulus is that it will require government borrowing and therefore raise debt levels. But the stimulus should also increase incomes, easing any debt burden. The author argues there is another strategy to create stimulus but with no additional debt. He analyzes a wide range of monetary alternatives as well.

Date: 2013
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (1)

Downloads: (external link)
http://hdl.handle.net/10.2753/0577-5132560602 (text/html)
Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

Related works:
Working Paper: STIMULUS WITHOUT DEBT (2014)
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:mes:challe:v:56:y:2013:i:6:p:38-59

Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from
http://www.tandfonline.com/pricing/journal/MCHA20

DOI: 10.2753/0577-5132560602

Access Statistics for this article

More articles in Challenge from Taylor & Francis Journals
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Chris Longhurst ().