Dimensionality on the Supreme Court

Michael A. Bailey

Journal of Institutional and Theoretical Economics (JITE), 2023, vol. 179, issue 1, 200-213

Abstract: Estimates of the ideological preferences of Supreme Court justices play a major role in the study of the court. This paper considers the dimensionality of these preferences. First, we consider unstructured approaches to multidimensionality, showing that the second dimension they produce is hard to explain and unstable over time. We then move toward a concept-driven approach to account for possible multidimensionality. This approach allows one to test whether concepts such as stare decisis lead justices to deviate from their one-dimensional left-right ideologies. This approach can help explain important outcomes on the court, although less so in recent years.

Keywords: idealpoints; SupremeCourt; preferencedimensionality; legalinfluencesonSupremeCourt (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: C01 K30 P00 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2023
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
https://www.mohrsiebeck.com/en/article/dimensional ... 101628jite-2023-0014
Fulltext access is included for subscribers to the printed version.

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:mhr:jinste:urn:doi:10.1628/jite-2023-0014

Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from
Mohr Siebeck GmbH & Co. KG, P.O.Box 2040, 72010 Tübingen, Germany

DOI: 10.1628/jite-2023-0014

Access Statistics for this article

Journal of Institutional and Theoretical Economics (JITE) is currently edited by Gerd Mühlheußer and Bayer, Ralph-C

More articles in Journal of Institutional and Theoretical Economics (JITE) from Mohr Siebeck, Tübingen
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Thomas Wolpert ().