Giant energy storage and power density negative capacitance superlattices
Suraj S. Cheema (),
Nirmaan Shanker,
Shang-Lin Hsu,
Joseph Schaadt,
Nathan M. Ellis,
Matthew Cook,
Ravi Rastogi,
Robert C. N. Pilawa-Podgurski,
Jim Ciston,
Mohamed Mohamed and
Sayeef Salahuddin ()
Additional contact information
Suraj S. Cheema: University of California
Nirmaan Shanker: University of California
Shang-Lin Hsu: University of California
Joseph Schaadt: University of California
Nathan M. Ellis: University of California
Matthew Cook: Massachusetts Institute of Technology
Ravi Rastogi: Massachusetts Institute of Technology
Robert C. N. Pilawa-Podgurski: University of California
Jim Ciston: Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory
Mohamed Mohamed: Massachusetts Institute of Technology
Sayeef Salahuddin: University of California
Nature, 2024, vol. 629, issue 8013, 803-809
Abstract:
Abstract Dielectric electrostatic capacitors1, because of their ultrafast charge–discharge, are desirable for high-power energy storage applications. Along with ultrafast operation, on-chip integration can enable miniaturized energy storage devices for emerging autonomous microelectronics and microsystems2–5. Moreover, state-of-the-art miniaturized electrochemical energy storage systems—microsupercapacitors and microbatteries—currently face safety, packaging, materials and microfabrication challenges preventing on-chip technological readiness2,3,6, leaving an opportunity for electrostatic microcapacitors. Here we report record-high electrostatic energy storage density (ESD) and power density, to our knowledge, in HfO2–ZrO2-based thin film microcapacitors integrated into silicon, through a three-pronged approach. First, to increase intrinsic energy storage, atomic-layer-deposited antiferroelectric HfO2–ZrO2 films are engineered near a field-driven ferroelectric phase transition to exhibit amplified charge storage by the negative capacitance effect7–12, which enhances volumetric ESD beyond the best-known back-end-of-the-line-compatible dielectrics (115 J cm−3) (ref. 13). Second, to increase total energy storage, antiferroelectric superlattice engineering14 scales the energy storage performance beyond the conventional thickness limitations of HfO2–ZrO2-based (anti)ferroelectricity15 (100-nm regime). Third, to increase the storage per footprint, the superlattices are conformally integrated into three-dimensional capacitors, which boosts the areal ESD nine times and the areal power density 170 times that of the best-known electrostatic capacitors: 80 mJ cm−2 and 300 kW cm−2, respectively. This simultaneous demonstration of ultrahigh energy density and power density overcomes the traditional capacity–speed trade-off across the electrostatic–electrochemical energy storage hierarchy1,16. Furthermore, the integration of ultrahigh-density and ultrafast-charging thin films within a back-end-of-the-line-compatible process enables monolithic integration of on-chip microcapacitors5, which can unlock substantial energy storage and power delivery performance for electronic microsystems17–19.
Date: 2024
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (5)
Downloads: (external link)
https://www.nature.com/articles/s41586-024-07365-5 Abstract (text/html)
Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.
Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
HTML/Text
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:nat:nature:v:629:y:2024:i:8013:d:10.1038_s41586-024-07365-5
Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from
https://www.nature.com/
DOI: 10.1038/s41586-024-07365-5
Access Statistics for this article
Nature is currently edited by Magdalena Skipper
More articles in Nature from Nature
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Sonal Shukla () and Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing ().