Self Reported Disability and Reference Groups
Arthur van Soest (),
Tatiana Andreyeva,
Arie Kapteyn and
James Smith
No 17153, NBER Working Papers from National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc
Abstract:
Social networks and social interactions affect individual and social norms. We develop a direct test of this using Dutch survey data on how respondents evaluate work disability of hypothetical people with some work related health problem (vignettes). We analyze how the thresholds respondents use to decide what constitutes a (mild or more serious) work disability depend on the number of people receiving disability insurance benefits (DI) in their reference group. We find that reference group effects are significant and contribute substantially to an explanation of why self-reported work disability in the Netherlands is much higher than in, for example, the US.
JEL-codes: J14 J21 J68 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2011-06
Note: AG EH
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (15)
Published as Self-Reported Disability and Reference Groups , Arthur van Soest, Tatiana Andreyeva, Arie Kapteyn, James P. Smith. in Investigations in the Economics of Aging , Wise. 2012
Downloads: (external link)
http://www.nber.org/papers/w17153.pdf (application/pdf)
Related works:
Chapter: Self-Reported Disability and Reference Groups (2011) 
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
HTML/Text
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:nbr:nberwo:17153
Ordering information: This working paper can be ordered from
http://www.nber.org/papers/w17153
Access Statistics for this paper
More papers in NBER Working Papers from National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc National Bureau of Economic Research, 1050 Massachusetts Avenue Cambridge, MA 02138, U.S.A.. Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by ().