Instrumental Variable Methods Reconcile Intention-to-Screen Effects Across Pragmatic Cancer Screening Trials

Joshua Angrist and Peter Hull

No 31443, NBER Working Papers from National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc

Abstract: Pragmatic cancer screening trials mimic real-world scenarios in which patients and doctors are the ultimate arbiters of treatment. Intention-to-screen (ITS) analyses of such trials maintain randomization-based apples-to-apples comparisons, but differential adherence (the failure of subjects assigned to screening to actually get screened) makes ITS effects hard to compare across trials and sites. We show how instrumental variables (IV) methods address the nonadherence challenge in a comparison of estimates from 17 sites in five randomized trials measuring screening effects on colorectal cancer incidence. While adherence rates and ITS estimates vary widely across and within trials, IV estimates of per-protocol screening effects are remarkably consistent. An application of simple IV tools, including graphical analysis and formal statistical tests, shows how differential adherence explains variation in ITS impact. Screening compliers are also shown to have similar demographic characteristics to those of the full trial study sample. These findings argue for the clinical relevance of IV estimates of cancer screening effects.

JEL-codes: C21 C26 C93 I12 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2023-07
Note: LS PE EH
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:

Published as Joshua D. Angrist & Peter Hull, 2023. "Instrumental variables methods reconcile intention-to-screen effects across pragmatic cancer screening trials," Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, vol 120(51).

Downloads: (external link)
http://www.nber.org/papers/w31443.pdf (application/pdf)

Related works:
Journal Article: Instrumental variables methods reconcile intention-to-screen effects across pragmatic cancer screening trials (2023)
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:nbr:nberwo:31443

Ordering information: This working paper can be ordered from
http://www.nber.org/papers/w31443

Access Statistics for this paper

More papers in NBER Working Papers from National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc National Bureau of Economic Research, 1050 Massachusetts Avenue Cambridge, MA 02138, U.S.A.. Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by ().