Privatization in the United States

Florencio Lopez- de-Silane, Andrei Shleifer and Robert Vishny
Authors registered in the RePEc Author Service: Florencio Lopez-de-Silanes ()

No 5113, NBER Working Papers from National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc

Abstract: In the United States, the two principal modes of producing local government services are inhouse provision by government employees and contracting out to private suppliers, also known as privatization. We examine empirically how United States counties choose their mode of providing services. The evidence indicates that state clean- government laws and state laws restricting county spending encourage privatization, whereas strong public unions discourage it. The evidence is inconsistent with the view that efficiency considerations alone govern the provision mode, and points to the important roles played by political patronage and taxpayer resistance to government spending in the privatization decision.

Date: 1995-05
Note: CF PE
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (13)

Published as Rand Journal of Economics, Vol. 28, no. 3 (1997): 447-471.

Downloads: (external link)
http://www.nber.org/papers/w5113.pdf (application/pdf)

Related works:
Journal Article: Privatization in the United States (1997)
Working Paper: Privatization in the United States (1997)
Working Paper: Privatization in the United States (1995)
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:nbr:nberwo:5113

Ordering information: This working paper can be ordered from
http://www.nber.org/papers/w5113

Access Statistics for this paper

More papers in NBER Working Papers from National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc National Bureau of Economic Research, 1050 Massachusetts Avenue Cambridge, MA 02138, U.S.A.. Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by ().