Federal Incarceration and Native American Felon Disenfranchisement in the US West

Melissa Rogers, Jean Schroedel and Joseph Dietrich

Journal of Political Institutions and Political Economy, 2024, vol. 5, issue 2, 259-283

Abstract: When Native Americans are arrested for felonies on most reservations, they are under the legal authority of the federal government and federal sentencing laws. They are subject to a convoluted system of jurisdiction in which they are held and tried off-reservation in federal courts. We ask how federal criminal justice policies have contributed to voting disenfranchisement of Native Americans in Western states. We document the role of federal government policies in the sentencing of Native Americans in Western states with felon disenfranchisement laws. We show that the path to disenfranchisement in these states flows through the federal government, which imposes longer sentences than most states for equivalent crimes. Federal felons are not eligible for parole, a key point when voting rights are restored in most states. The jurisdictional challenges, legal ambiguities, and concerns with voting violations strongly discourage Native felons from voting after their sentences.

Date: 2024
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
http://dx.doi.org/10.1561/113.00000101 (application/xml)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:now:jnlpip:113.00000101

Access Statistics for this article

More articles in Journal of Political Institutions and Political Economy from now publishers
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Lucy Wiseman ().