Egg size and reproductive allocation in eusocial thrips

Brenda D. Kranz

Behavioral Ecology, 2005, vol. 16, issue 4, 779-787

Abstract: Reproductive allocation, in terms of fecundity and egg size, has been given little consideration in eusocial societies. To begin to address this, absolute and body size--adjusted egg volumes were compared, along with fecundity, between the foundress and her subfertile soldier offspring in the eusocial, gall-inducing thrips, Kladothrips hamiltoni, Kladothrips waterhousei, and Kladothrips habrus, and a congeneric, Kladothrips morrisi, with fully fecund soldiers. Soldiers produced significantly larger eggs than the foundress in all species except K. morrisi, where egg volumes did not differ. After accounting for body size, soldiers produced significantly smaller eggs than the foundress in K. morrisi and marginally so in K. waterhousei, but egg sizes did not differ in K. hamiltoni and K. habrus. When egg size and fecundity data are combined, K. morrisi soldiers invest less in reproduction than the foundress, and in conjunction with other life-history features the species can be considered eusocial. Maximum likelihood analyses reveal relatively low reproductive allocation skew in the ancestral lineages and high skew in the derived lineages, but the trend is not significant when fecundity and egg size are considered separately. Gall size covaried negatively with soldier-to-foundress relative body size--adjusted egg size and reproductive allocation and marginally so with fecundity, suggesting that gall size is a determinant of egg size and fecundity trade-offs in eusocial thrips and providing the strongest support to date that gall size has featured in the social evolution of this clade. This study highlights that data on fecundity alone may be insufficient for assessing reproductive division of labor. Copyright 2005.

Keywords: egg size; eusociality; density-dependent selection; galling thrips; phylogenetic directionality; reproductive allocation (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2005
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
http://hdl.handle.net/10.1093/beheco/ari053 (application/pdf)
Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:oup:beheco:v:16:y:2005:i:4:p:779-787

Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from
https://academic.oup.com/journals

Access Statistics for this article

Behavioral Ecology is currently edited by Louise Barrett

More articles in Behavioral Ecology from International Society for Behavioral Ecology Oxford University Press, Great Clarendon Street, Oxford OX2 6DP, UK.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Oxford University Press ().