Spontaneous quantity discrimination in the Australian sleepy lizard (Tiliqua rugosa)

Birgit Szabo, Madeleine L Holmes, Benjamin J Ashton and Martin J Whiting

Behavioral Ecology, 2024, vol. 35, issue 1, 214-236

Abstract: Animals employ quantitative abilities to gauge crucial aspects of their environment, such as food or predator density in a given area or the number of eggs in a nest. These quantitative skills hold ecological implications and can impact an animal’s fitness. However, our comprehension of how these abilities intersect with environmental challenges remains limited. We tested for spontaneous quantity discrimination in the sleepy lizard (Tiliqua rugosa), a long-lived species known for forming life-long pair bonds in which pairs come together for the breeding season. We subjected lizards to a Y-maze experiment presenting both discrete (comparisons involving two vs. four, two vs. six, two vs. eight, four vs. six, four vs. eight, and six vs. eight pieces) and equivalent continuous combinations (single pieces differing in size) of pumpkin pieces. Our findings revealed that sleepy lizards exhibited spontaneous quantity discrimination, favoring the larger quantity in three discrete comparisons (eight vs. two, two vs. six, four vs. six) and two continuous comparisons (eight vs. two, eight vs. four). However, low accuracy may be attributable to difficulty in visual acuity exacerbated by difficulty discriminating quantities at small ratios. Furthermore, we found no evidence for a speed-accuracy trade-off in their decision-making process. Our results suggest that sleepy lizards likely employ multiple cues to estimate quantity accurately. Considering these results in the context of previous studies on various lizard species, it becomes apparent that lizards, as a group, offer a valuable model for unraveling the evolution of cognition, given their diverse ecology and sociobiology.

Keywords: cognition; foraging; number sense; reptile; Squamata (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2024
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
http://hdl.handle.net/10.1093/beheco/arad089 (application/pdf)
Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:oup:beheco:v:35:y:2024:i:1:p:214-236.

Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from
https://academic.oup.com/journals

Access Statistics for this article

Behavioral Ecology is currently edited by Louise Barrett

More articles in Behavioral Ecology from International Society for Behavioral Ecology Oxford University Press, Great Clarendon Street, Oxford OX2 6DP, UK.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Oxford University Press ().