Preferences, reductionism and the microfoundations of Analytical Marxism
Bruce Philp
Cambridge Journal of Economics, 2002, vol. 26, issue 3, 313-329
Abstract:
Analytical Marxism has recommended that Marxian theory should conform to 'normal' scientific methods and that this should involve the development of microfoundations. The latter has involved the adoption of rational choice theory and its corresponding assumptions regarding agents' behaviour. This paper seeks to question this position and highlight a number of problems which Analytical Marxism faces, particularly in the domain of economic theory. The different views of science espoused by Analytical Marxists display a tension between 'positivist' and 'realist' perspectives, and the arguments for individualist and anti-reductionist approaches to social and economic theory are also argued to be problematic. The approach of Analytical Marxism, it is suggested, can involve the uncritical adoption of many of the assumptions of standard economic theory and, as such, it is subject to a number of substantive criticisms, some of which have been elaborated from within mainstream economic theory. Copyright 2002, Oxford University Press.
Date: 2002
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:
There are no downloads for this item, see the EconPapers FAQ for hints about obtaining it.
Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
HTML/Text
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:oup:cambje:v:26:y:2002:i:3:p:313-329
Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from
https://academic.oup.com/journals
Access Statistics for this article
Cambridge Journal of Economics is currently edited by Jacqui Lagrue
More articles in Cambridge Journal of Economics from Cambridge Political Economy Society Oxford University Press, Great Clarendon Street, Oxford OX2 6DP, UK.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Oxford University Press ().