‘Total factor productivity vs. realism’ revisited: the case of the South Korean steel industry

Hajime Sato

Cambridge Journal of Economics, 2005, vol. 29, issue 4, 635-655

Abstract: This paper presents key features of the development of the South Korean steel industry through the critical examination of an article by Truett and Truett. Despite their claim to exhibit 'realism' by use of a translog cost function, their methodology has strong affinities with the methods of measuring total factor productivity growth, which have long been known as invalid but continue to be applied not least to the experience of East Asian countries. It will be argued that the theoretical and empirical flaws involved with these methods invalidate their results and corresponding policy implications. Above all, by showing that the assumptions for their calculation do not hold in terms of the economic conditions of the industry, the paper points to a different understanding of 'realism' than that conceived by and for their study. Copyright 2005, Oxford University Press.

Date: 2005
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (2)

Downloads: (external link)
http://hdl.handle.net/10.1093/cje/bei022 (text/html)
Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:oup:cambje:v:29:y:2005:i:4:p:635-655

Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from
https://academic.oup.com/journals

Access Statistics for this article

Cambridge Journal of Economics is currently edited by Jacqui Lagrue

More articles in Cambridge Journal of Economics from Cambridge Political Economy Society Oxford University Press, Great Clarendon Street, Oxford OX2 6DP, UK.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Oxford University Press ().