EconPapers    
Economics at your fingertips  
 

Capital, Technology, and Time

On the indeterminacy of capital accumulation paths

Donald J Harris

Contributions to Political Economy, 2022, vol. 41, issue 1, 180-188

Abstract: This paper examines the substantive meaning and limitations of the concept of choice of technique, developed in the context of a test of logical consistency of the neoclassical parable concerning the relation between techniques of production and distribution of income in capitalist economies, and commonly used as a vehicle to support propositions about changes in technology. This concept is shown to rest on a foundation of logical time that is antithetical to a conception of historical time relevant to observed features of technological change. In this regard, it exposes a fundamental lacuna in the traditional neoclassical narrative and supporting theory related to the dual problems of agency and dynamics of the transition process involved in analysis of capital accumulation and technological change. There is room here for emerging alternative narratives to provide effective resolution of these problems.

Date: 2022
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (1)

Downloads: (external link)
http://hdl.handle.net/10.1093/cpe/bzac005 (application/pdf)
Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:oup:copoec:v:41:y:2022:i:1:p:180-188.

Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from
https://academic.oup.com/journals

Access Statistics for this article

Contributions to Political Economy is currently edited by Jacqui Lagrue

More articles in Contributions to Political Economy from Cambridge Political Economy Society Oxford University Press, Great Clarendon Street, Oxford OX2 6DP, UK.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Oxford University Press ().

 
Page updated 2025-03-19
Handle: RePEc:oup:copoec:v:41:y:2022:i:1:p:180-188.