Credible Commitments and Investment: Does Opportunistic Ability or Incentive Matter?
Dino Falaschetti
Economic Inquiry, 2003, vol. 41, issue 4, 660-674
Abstract:
Private investment increases in a cross-country panel when formal institutions (e.g., term limits) do not constrain executives' planning horizons. This evidence is consistent with institutions that encourage reputation-building checking opportunistic incentives and extends evidence from domestic public choice applications to an international political economy setting. In addition, investment exhibits a nonmonotonic relationship with a polity's veto players. This relationship may reflect trade-offs between constituents' monitoring-capacity and agents' opportunistic ability. It may also highlight a channel through which lock-in effects retard neoclassical convergence and thus motivate different normative prescriptions than those emerging from contributions where institutions and real activity must exhibit a monotonic relationship. (JEL D72, D78, E61) Copyright 2003, Oxford University Press.
JEL-codes: D72 D78 E61 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2003
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (4)
Downloads: (external link)
http://hdl.handle.net/10.1093/ei/cbg035 (text/html)
Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
HTML/Text
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:oup:ecinqu:v:41:y:2003:i:4:p:660-674
Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from
https://academic.oup.com/journals
Access Statistics for this article
Economic Inquiry is currently edited by Preston McAfee
More articles in Economic Inquiry from Western Economic Association International Oxford University Press, Great Clarendon Street, Oxford OX2 6DP, UK. Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Oxford University Press ().