Gender Differences in Mobility Device Use Among U.S. Older Adults

Lindsay J Peterson, Hongdao Meng, Debra Dobbs and Kathryn Hyer

The Journals of Gerontology: Series B, 2017, vol. 72, issue 5, 827-835

Abstract: ObjectivesResearch has shown greater mobility limitations among women than men. We aimed to examine (a) gender differences in the use of canes for mobility and (b) what factors contribute to these differences under the frameworks of the disablement model and the Theory of Planned Behavior.MethodUsing National Health and Aging Trends Study data, we estimated hierarchical logistic regression models to predict the likelihood of cane use among older adults who completed performance-based measures (n = 5,503). We tested the interactions between gender and selected variables to further understand gender difference.ResultsIn unadjusted analysis, 22% of women and 16% of men used canes. In models adjusted in steps for sociodemographics, health, physical impairments, capacity, psychosocial, and social environment factors, women were progressively less likely to use canes, significantly so at the last step. Suppression effect analyses showed the influence of living alone and receiving mobility help variables. Interaction analyses showed that women reporting poor health or balance were less likely to use canes; obese women were more likely.DiscussionSignificant gender differences exist in cane use among older community-living adults. Findings suggest that health and function partly account for these differences. Future research is needed to understand social/cultural factors involved.

Keywords: Assistive devices; Disablement; Mobility; Theory of Planned Behavior (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2017
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
http://hdl.handle.net/10.1093/geronb/gbw081 (application/pdf)
Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:oup:geronb:v:72:y:2017:i:5:p:827-835.

Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from
https://academic.oup.com/journals

Access Statistics for this article

The Journals of Gerontology: Series B is currently edited by Psychological Sciences - S. Duke Han, PhD and Social Sciences - Jessica A Kelley, PhD, FGSA

More articles in The Journals of Gerontology: Series B from The Gerontological Society of America Oxford University Press, Great Clarendon Street, Oxford OX2 6DP, UK.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Oxford University Press ().