Innovation decision making in high-risk organizations: A comparison of the US and Soviet attack submarine programs

Paul Bierly, Scott Gallagher and J.-C. Spender ()

Industrial and Corporate Change, 2014, vol. 23, issue 3, 759-795

Abstract: Decision-making about innovative change in high-risk networks is exceptionally difficult because system failure may result in catastrophe. We adopt a historical method to compare the US and Soviet choices in their nuclear attack submarine programs between 1970 and 1996 and to surface their complex political, technological, and operational relations. One program achieved high reliability in the face of innovation while the other did not. Actor network theory (ANT) helps illuminate the interactions and resulting innovation paths and dependencies. We study how (i) open communication and power dispersion across high-risk networks influence system reliability, (ii) individuals spanning multiple groups within the network generate dominant coalitions, and (iii) strong safety advocates impact the network.

Date: 2014
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
http://hdl.handle.net/10.1093/icc/dtt026 (application/pdf)
Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:oup:indcch:v:23:y:2014:i:3:p:759-795.

Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from
https://academic.oup.com/journals

Access Statistics for this article

Industrial and Corporate Change is currently edited by Josef Chytry

More articles in Industrial and Corporate Change from Oxford University Press and the Associazione ICC Oxford University Press, Great Clarendon Street, Oxford OX2 6DP, UK.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Oxford University Press ().