Innovation assessment: probing the future

Dominique Foray and Luc Soete

Industrial and Corporate Change, 2025, vol. 34, issue 6, 1309-1321

Abstract: This paper, written in honor of Paul David, explores the need for a new “assessment” discipline, called innovation assessment (IA). Such a new assessment discipline is needed as innovation has gradually disconnected itself from primarily technological based breakthroughs to broader social and organizational change issues and as a result seized progressively more or less all fields of economic policy. Contrary to the old field of technology assessment (TA), which involved ex ante technological experimentation performed in engineering laboratories, IA should consist of ex post observation and evaluation following ideally the full deployment of the innovation in the economy. As a result, IA will be a more complex process creating many policy dilemmas and trade-offs, some of which were already at the center of Paul David’s writings in the late 80s, in particular what he called the “Blind Giant dilemma.”

JEL-codes: O25 O31 O38 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2025
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
http://hdl.handle.net/10.1093/icc/dtaf043 (application/pdf)
Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:oup:indcch:v:34:y:2025:i:6:p:1309-1321.

Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from
https://academic.oup.com/journals

Access Statistics for this article

Industrial and Corporate Change is currently edited by Josef Chytry

More articles in Industrial and Corporate Change from Oxford University Press and the Associazione ICC Oxford University Press, Great Clarendon Street, Oxford OX2 6DP, UK.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Oxford University Press ().