EconPapers    
Economics at your fingertips  
 

Illusionary Progress in Loyalty Programs: Magnitudes, Reward Distances, and Step-Size Ambiguity

Rajesh Bagchi and Xingbo Li

Journal of Consumer Research, 2011, vol. 37, issue 5, 888 - 901

Abstract: Loyalty programs offer rewards via mediums of different magnitudes (e.g., "$6 off when you accumulate 1,000 [100] points. Earn 10 [1] points/dollar"). The program medium presents two key pieces of information: reward distance (points required to redeem reward) and step size (points earned per dollar). In higher-magnitude (vs. lower-magnitude) programs, both reward distances (1,000 vs. 100) and step sizes (10 vs. 1 point[s]/dollar) are larger. How do these two pieces of information affect consumers' postenrollment inferences of progress, store loyalty, and recommendation likelihood? Do consumers always integrate both pieces? We identify a moderator, step-size ambiguity, and show that when ambiguity is high, only reward distance affects inferences. When ambiguity is lower, consumers integrate step size with reward distance, but in a biased manner. Implications arise in goal following and in physical and psychological distance estimation contexts (e.g., weight loss, savings) where distances and step sizes can vary (e.g., as a function of units: kilograms vs. pounds), but especially in loyalty rewards contexts.

Date: 2011
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (23)

Downloads: (external link)
http://dx.doi.org/10.1086/656392 (application/pdf)
http://dx.doi.org/10.1086/656392 (text/html)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:oup:jconrs:doi:10.1086/656392

Access Statistics for this article

Journal of Consumer Research is currently edited by Bernd Schmitt, June Cotte, Markus Giesler, Andrew Stephen and Stacy Wood

More articles in Journal of Consumer Research from Journal of Consumer Research Inc.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by ().

 
Page updated 2025-03-19
Handle: RePEc:oup:jconrs:doi:10.1086/656392