The Locus of Choice: Personal Causality and Satisfaction with Hedonic and Utilitarian Decisions

Simona Botti and Ann L. McGill

Journal of Consumer Research, 2011, vol. 37, issue 6, 1065 - 1078

Abstract: Consumers may consume the same products or services with different goals, for example, for their own pleasure--a hedonic goal--or to achieve some higher level purpose--a utilitarian goal. This article investigates whether this difference in goals influences satisfaction with an outcome that was either self-chosen or externally determined. In four experiments we manipulate consumption goals, controlling for the outcomes, the option valence, and whether the externally made choice was determined by an expert or at random. Results show that the outcome of a self-made choice is more satisfying than the outcome of an externally made choice when the goal is hedonic but not when it is utilitarian. We hypothesize that this effect results from the greater perceived personal causality associated with terminally motivated activities, such as hedonic choices, relative to instrumentally motivated activities, such as utilitarian choices, and provide evidence that supports this explanation over alternative accounts.

Date: 2011
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (58)

Downloads: (external link)
http://dx.doi.org/10.1086/656570 (application/pdf)
http://dx.doi.org/10.1086/656570 (text/html)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:oup:jconrs:doi:10.1086/656570

Access Statistics for this article

Journal of Consumer Research is currently edited by Bernd Schmitt, June Cotte, Markus Giesler, Andrew Stephen and Stacy Wood

More articles in Journal of Consumer Research from Journal of Consumer Research Inc.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by ().