Job Protection: The Macho Hypothesis
Yann Algan and
Pierre Cahuc
Oxford Review of Economic Policy, 2006, vol. 22, issue 3, 390-410
Abstract:
This paper shows that the stringency of employment protection in Mediterranean countries can be partly explained by cultural values embedded in religion. Both the security provided by this legislation and its redistributive effects in favour of the male breadwinner insiders fit into the framework of Mediterranean religions. First, international individual surveys allow us to document that Catholics and Muslims are more likely to agree with traditional gender division of work than Protestants and the non-religious. Second, we develop a political economy model predicting that employment protection should be more stringent in countries where there is a larger share of insiders supportive of traditional family values. We then show that this prediction is supported by empirical evidence on OECD countries over the period 1970--99. Copyright 2006, Oxford University Press.
Date: 2006
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (79)
There are no downloads for this item, see the EconPapers FAQ for hints about obtaining it.
Related works:
Working Paper: Job Protection: the Macho Hypothesis? (2006) 
Working Paper: Job Protection: The Macho Hypothesis? (2006)
Working Paper: Job protection: the Macho Hypothesis? (2004) 
Working Paper: Job protection: the Macho Hypothesis? (2004) 
Working Paper: Job Protection: The Macho Hypothesis (2004) 
Working Paper: Job protection: The Macho hypothesis (2004) 
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
HTML/Text
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:oup:oxford:v:22:y:2006:i:3:p:390-410
Access Statistics for this article
Oxford Review of Economic Policy is currently edited by Christopher Adam
More articles in Oxford Review of Economic Policy from Oxford University Press and Oxford Review of Economic Policy Limited
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Oxford University Press ().