A Theory of Liquidity and Regulation of Financial Intermediation
Emmanuel Farhi,
Mikhail Golosov and
Aleh Tsyvinski
The Review of Economic Studies, 2009, vol. 76, issue 3, 973-992
Abstract:
This paper studies a Diamond-Dybvig model of providing insurance against unobservable liquidity shocks in the presence of unobservable trades. We show that competitive equilibria are inefficient. A social planner finds it beneficial to introduce a wedge between the interest rate implicit in optimal allocations and the economy's marginal rate of transformation. This improves risk sharing by reducing the attractiveness of joint deviations where agents simultaneously misrepresent their type and engage in trades on private markets. We propose a simple implementation of the optimum that imposes a constraint on the portfolio share that financial intermediaries invest in short-term assets. Copyright , Wiley-Blackwell.
Date: 2009
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (162)
Downloads: (external link)
http://hdl.handle.net/10.1111/j.1467-937X.2009.00540.x (application/pdf)
Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
Related works:
Working Paper: A Theory of Liquidity and Regulation of Financial Intermediation (2009) 
Working Paper: A Theory of Liquidity and Regulation of Financial Intermediation (2008) 
Working Paper: A Theory of Liquidity and Regulation of Financial Intermediation (2007) 
Working Paper: A Theory of Liquidity and Regulation of Financial Intermediation (2006) 
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
HTML/Text
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:oup:restud:v:76:y:2009:i:3:p:973-992
Access Statistics for this article
The Review of Economic Studies is currently edited by Thomas Chaney, Xavier d’Haultfoeuille, Andrea Galeotti, Bård Harstad, Nir Jaimovich, Katrine Loken, Elias Papaioannou, Vincent Sterk and Noam Yuchtman
More articles in The Review of Economic Studies from Review of Economic Studies Ltd
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Oxford University Press ().