Employee Relations in Multinational Companies
Heinz-Josef Tüselmann,
Frank McDonald,
Arne Heise,
Matthew M. C. Allen and
Svitlana Voronkova
Additional contact information
Heinz-Josef Tüselmann: Manchester Metropolitan University Business School
Frank McDonald: Bradford University School of Management
Matthew M. C. Allen: Manchester Metropolitan University Business School
Svitlana Voronkova: University of Dublin
Chapter 3 in Employee Relations in Foreign-Owned Subsidiaries, 2007, pp 25-36 from Palgrave Macmillan
Abstract:
Abstract As outlined in Chapter 2, employee relations (ER) in different national economies are often portrayed as being distinct. This raises a number of issues when a company from one country establishes a subsidiary in another with a different ER infrastructure. In short, do the subsidiaries conform to the prevailing institutional logic of the host country or do the investing firms attempt to ‘export’ some of their home-country ER practices to their subsidiaries abroad? Or, indeed, do investing companies attempt to establish what might be termed ‘best practice’ ER policies in their subsidiaries abroad? In the literature, an emphasis tends to be placed, very broadly, either on country-of-origin effects or on best practices. In the former, distinct patterns of ER will emerge in MNCs based on nationality of ownership; in the latter, ER practices will be expected to converge towards the best-practice model. Convergence towards best practice should lead to the adoption of ‘global best practice’ ER systems in MNCS. If country-of-origin effects are dominant over global best practice effects, ER systems in foreign-owned subsidiaries are likely to display complex interactions between national institutional frameworks and ER practices that come from the home country of the MNC. Differences in competitive environments also affect the adoption and evolution of ER systems in foreign-owned subsidiaries. In order to compete in tough market conditions, MNCs often face strong pressures to adopt global best practice systems, despite national institutional constraints that hamper the reform of ER systems.
Keywords: Dominance Effect; Employee Relation; Multinational Company; Industry Culture; International Integration (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2007
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (5)
There are no downloads for this item, see the EconPapers FAQ for hints about obtaining it.
Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
HTML/Text
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:pal:palchp:978-0-230-59200-1_3
Ordering information: This item can be ordered from
http://www.palgrave.com/9780230592001
DOI: 10.1057/9780230592001_3
Access Statistics for this chapter
More chapters in Palgrave Macmillan Books from Palgrave Macmillan
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Sonal Shukla () and Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing ().