Testing Rare-Variant Association without Calling Genotypes Allows for Systematic Differences in Sequencing between Cases and Controls

Yi-Juan Hu, Peizhou Liao, H Richard Johnston, Andrew S Allen and Glen A Satten

PLOS Genetics, 2016, vol. 12, issue 5, 1-19

Abstract: Next-generation sequencing of DNA provides an unprecedented opportunity to discover rare genetic variants associated with complex diseases and traits. However, the common practice of first calling underlying genotypes and then treating the called values as known is prone to false positive findings, especially when genotyping errors are systematically different between cases and controls. This happens whenever cases and controls are sequenced at different depths, on different platforms, or in different batches. In this article, we provide a likelihood-based approach to testing rare variant associations that directly models sequencing reads without calling genotypes. We consider the (weighted) burden test statistic, which is the (weighted) sum of the score statistic for assessing effects of individual variants on the trait of interest. Because variant locations are unknown, we develop a simple, computationally efficient screening algorithm to estimate the loci that are variants. Because our burden statistic may not have mean zero after screening, we develop a novel bootstrap procedure for assessing the significance of the burden statistic. We demonstrate through extensive simulation studies that the proposed tests are robust to a wide range of differential sequencing qualities between cases and controls, and are at least as powerful as the standard genotype calling approach when the latter controls type I error. An application to the UK10K data reveals novel rare variants in gene BTBD18 associated with childhood onset obesity. The relevant software is freely available.Author Summary: In next-generation sequencing studies, there are typically systematic differences in sequencing qualities (e.g., depth) between cases and controls, because the entire studies are rarely sequenced in exactly the same way. It has long been appreciated that, in the presence of such differences, the standard genotype calling approach to detecting rare variant associations generally leads to excessive false positive findings. To deal with this, the current “state of the art” is to impose stringent quality control procedures that much of the data is eliminated. We present a method that allows analyzing data with a wide range of differential sequencing qualities between cases and controls. Our method is more powerful than the current practice and can accelerate the search for disease-causing mutations.

Date: 2016
References: View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (1)

Downloads: (external link)
https://journals.plos.org/plosgenetics/article?id=10.1371/journal.pgen.1006040 (text/html)
https://journals.plos.org/plosgenetics/article/fil ... 06040&type=printable (application/pdf)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:plo:pgen00:1006040

DOI: 10.1371/journal.pgen.1006040

Access Statistics for this article

More articles in PLOS Genetics from Public Library of Science
Bibliographic data for series maintained by plosgenetics ().