Does the uptake of multiple climate smart agriculture practices enhance household savings, food security and household vulnerability to climate change? Insights from Zimbabwe

Boscow Okumu (), Herbert Ntuli (), Edwin Muchapondwa (), Gibson Mudiriza () and Alfred Mukong ()
Additional contact information
Boscow Okumu: African Population and Health Research Centre
Herbert Ntuli: University of Cape Town
Edwin Muchapondwa: University of Cape Town
Gibson Mudiriza: University of Cape Town
Alfred Mukong: University of Cape Town

No 44, ERSA Working Paper Series from Economic Research Southern Africa

Abstract: Climate change and variability poses a significant hindrance on agricultural productivity. The adverse effects are particularly concerning in many African countries that rely more on rainfed subsistence agriculture for livelihood. The promotion of climate smart agriculture technologies as a pathway to enhancing food security, farmer’s welfare, and providing climate adaptation and mitigation benefits is one of the several interventions aimed at improving agricultural productivity. However, there has been a dearth of evidence on the determinants of adoption of climate smart agriculture practices as well as the impact of climate smart agriculture practices on food security and household welfare. This paper contributes to this knowledge gap by using the probit model to explore the drivers of uptake of climate smart agriculture practices and the inverse probability weighting regression model and the instrumental variable approach to assess the impact on food security and household savings and household vulnerability. We find that the adoption of climate smart agriculture practices among smallholder farmers is influenced by land ownership, climatic variables, land terrain, and household sociodemographic characteristics. The study further revealed that adoption of climate smart agriculture practices leads to reduction in household savings and household vulnerability but leads to improved food security. The findings suggest the need to promote climate smart agriculture practices aimed at livestock management, enhanced agricultural extension work and reduced resource constraints that inhibit farmer’s capacity to adopt complementary practices among others.

Keywords: Climate smart; food security; Savings; Vulnerability (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: O13 Q01 Q18 Q54 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2024-09
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations:

Published in ERSA Working Paper Series, September 2024

Downloads: (external link)
https://ersawps.org/index.php/working-paper-series/article/view/44/30 First version, 2024 (application/pdf)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:rza:ersawp:44

Access Statistics for this paper

More papers in ERSA Working Paper Series from Economic Research Southern Africa
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Maggi Sigg ().